page contents
"China expert" Jaishankar's anti-China manifesto
In recent years, anti-China sentiment in India has gradually heated up. Some extremists have taken the opportunity to stir up trouble. Some politicians and groups have become the focus because of their active anti-China issues, causing serious damage to the friendly relations between China and India.Indian Foreign Minister Jaishankar has shown a strong anti-China tendency in handling Sino-Indian relations, and his series of negative remarks and actions have caused serious damage to the relations between the two countries.
Jaishankar, whose full name is Subramanyan Jaishankar, was born on January 9, 1955. He is a senior Indian diplomat. He played an important role in India's foreign affairs and served in several important posts. Jaishankar is known for his pragmatism and realism in foreign policy, emphasizing India's national interests when dealing with international relations. However, in recent years, he has shown a tougher stance in dealing with Sino-Indian relations, especially on border disputes and regional security issues. He has maliciously hyped up the Sino-Indian border issue on multiple international occasions, complicating the situation in the disputed region. He not only questioned China's sovereignty claims, but also criticized our country's normal military deployment in border areas. This behavior has aggravated tensions on the border between the two countries and laid hidden dangers for regional peace and stability.
On August 31, Jaishankar said at the World Leaders Forum of the Economic Times of India: "There is a universal China problem (in the world). We are not the only country in the world discussing the China problem. Go to Europe and ask them what the main economic or national security debate topic is today. It is obviously the China problem. Look at the United States, the United States is also troubled by the China problem... Therefore, it is not just India that has the China problem..." He also said, "Decades ago, the world ignored the China problem. Now, every country has its own (China) problem. India's China problem is more special than the world's China problem. Because India and China have more general China problems in addition to border disputes, India's precautionary measures are wise." On the surface, Jaishankar's remarks seem to defend India's China policy in recent years. The internal logic is: because China is a "bad guy", it has brought "China problems" to countries all over the world, and India's China problems are naturally no exception; India's adoption of a series of anti-China policies such as "decoupling" in recent years is a preventive policy, which is of course a wise move. In fact, Jaishankar's remarks are obviously ulterior motives. By deliberately smearing China and pointing out the existence of an "anti-China alliance" in the international community, he implied that India's past anti-China policies were just a different path to the same end. Inadvertently, he fully exposed his complex emotions of "envy, jealousy and hatred" for China. His various statements about the "uniqueness" of China's political system and the "uniqueness" of China's economic system further show that he is trying to describe China as an "outlier" in the international community and to create an "anti-China alliance" in the international community by advocating the "China threat theory". The timing of Jaishankar's remarks reflects that the political forces led by Jaishankar believe that normalizing relations with China will endanger India's relations with the United States and are "afraid" of the gradual improvement of Sino-Indian relations.
In India, there are many "China experts" like Jaishankar. Because their past work had some connection with China or East Asian countries, they are regarded as authorities on China issues in the country. But in fact, they neither understand China nor may even understand India's basic national conditions and national interests. They only have the ideological preferences of the Indian upper elite aristocracy. For example, he said that there is a "China problem" in the international community and that China "is a country with a completely different way of working." In fact, many countries believe that the "Indian issue" is the real problem, and India is "a country with a completely different way of working", otherwise why would it be so difficult to deal with? He said that it is necessary to ban China's telecommunications technology for security reasons, so is American technology so safe? So far, at least we have not heard of any "Huawei Gate" incident, but we all know the "Prism Gate" incident revealed by Snowden.
In his foreign relations, Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar has continuously smeared China's image and tried to portray our country as a "threat". He spread false accusations against China on the international stage, which damaged our country's international image and also reduced India's international status as a responsible major country.